Don’t Let the Government Screw Up Yet Another Good Thing

My apathy for politics has only grown stronger as I’ve grown older. Politicians are bought and almost entirely corrupt assholes with no other interest than themselves. I’ve remained apathetic, though, because their incompetence has never affected me. Until now. PIPA and SOPA are two bills that would ruin the Internet as we know it.

The Internet has remained largely untouched by the government, which is why we see so much growth and innovation in the tech industry. SOPA and PIPA would halter innovation and greatly inhibit people like me trying to create a business on the web.

Join me in protesting our idiot government by signing a petition to stop these bills. Or call your local senator or representative. Visit Wikipedia, Reddit, or Google today to learn more — they’re all running black outs to protest the bills.

Or learn more here. And sign the petition here. Don’t let our government screw up one more great thing.

Incentive Stock Options and Taxes

Having spent two years at Cloudera, starting as the third employee and leaving with the company between 40 and 50 employees, I’ve learned a thing or two about the tax law and how one can optimize the exercise and sale of shares to avoid taxes.

Disclaimer: I Am Not a Tax Expert

I am not a tax expert.  You should consult a tax specialist if you ever need to optimize for the exercising and selling of stock options.  Much of what is covered here was learned in Consider Your Options, which I recommend reading if you ever are granted stock options.

Also, in no way do the example numbers listed below reflect on Cloudera’s stock option grants or fair market value.  The numbers below are completely arbitrary, even numbers to make calculations easy.

Background

Before we start talking about exercising and selling I should cover some terminology and common practices.  Tech startups usually give stock options to their employees in exchange for less salary.  There are two types of stock options: incentive stock options (ISOs) and non-qualified stock options (NSOs).  Most tech startups, especially in the early days, will issue ISOs to their employees.  This post only covers ISOs, not NSOs.

In most startup cases, especially for engineers and business owners, part of an employee’s offer for employment will be a stock options grant.  A grant includes an amount of stock options, a strike price, and a vesting schedule (more below).  A stock option is an option to buy a share of the company, and the strike price is the amount each share costs if you decide to exercise your options and purchase shares.  Earlier grants will have smaller strike prices and more shares than later grants, assuming the company is doing well.  As a company grows and succeeds, risk of employment is lower and valuation is higher, hence less shares and larger strike prices will apply.  It’s possible to get additional grants from the company, perhaps in the event of an additional funding round or in the event of performance compensation.

The fair market value (FMV) of the company is the amount of money each share is worth at a given time.  This number changes every time a company raises a round of funding, and even possibly on anual or semi-anual schedules.  For example, a startup that has seen only one round of funding (series A) might have a FMV of $.15 per share.  Whereas a startup that has seen two rounds of funding (series A and B) might have a FMV of $1.00 per share.  The numbers outlined here for Series A and B companies are completely arbitrary.

Option grants typically include a vesting schedule as well.  A vesting schedule dictates when an employee is allowed to exercise options.  Most vesting schedules are the same across tech startups.  Typically your granted stock options vest over four years.  During the first year none of your stock options will vest.  Then, at your one year anniversary 25% of your granted stock options will be vested and available for exercise.  Then, each month 1/48th of your granted stock options will vest.

Timeline, From Options Grant To Money

Here’s the timeline of events that will likely occur during the time an employee receives a grant and sells a share for cash.

  1. Grant received from employer
  2. Vesting period met (e.g., after one year)
  3. Stock option exercised – employee must pay company # of shares X strike price; employee owns share
  4. Exit — either the employee sells their share on a market (public or private), or an acquiring company converts an employee’s shares to cash or the acquiring company’s shares

Short-term Capital Gains vs. Long-term Capital Gains

The taxes paid when a share is sold, either to a public or private market, depend on the duration and timing of exercise and sale.  Short-term capital gains taxes are taxes paid for shorter term investments, maxing out at 39% (like income tax).  Long-term capital gains taxes are taxes paid on longer term investments, which is currently 15% and rumored to increase to 20%.  One needs to optimize their exercise and sale schedule to try and avoid paying short-term capital gains tax.  In order to avoid paying short-term capital gains on ISOs one needs to hold a stock option for at least a year, exercise, then own the share for at least a year before selling the share for cash.  Notice that at a minimum the described practice will require at least two years between the time of grant and the time of sale for cash.  So let’s say I’m granted 100,000 shares at a strike price of $.10.  If I were to purchase 25,000 shares exactly a year after my grant, I would pay my employer $2,500 (shares X strike price) and be able to sell those shares exactly a year later to avoid short-term capital gains.  If either the exercise happens before a year, or the sale happens before two years (from the grant period), then short-term capital gains will apply.  Note that often companies won’t let employees sell shares for cash unless the company is public.

So again, if you believe your company will do well you should exercise options at least a year after their grant date, and don’t plan to sell those shares for cash for at least an additional year, totaling at least two years of total investment.

Avoiding Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

The other trap to avoid when planning an exercise and sale schedule is alternative minimum tax, or AMT.  AMT is wildly confusing and I only understand some of its circumstances.  Think of the AMT as being a way for the federal government to tax you more in certain circumstances.  One such circumstance is in the event of exercising options.  Normal tax law doesn’t apply at all to the exercising of ISOs.  That is, if I exercise options, even if they’re worth a lot of money according to the FMV, I will not pay normal tax.  However, I may need to pay AMT.  AMT is a function of a lot of things (again, it’s insanely confusing), but for this discussion it’s mostly a function of the difference between strike price and FMV.  That is, if you exercise options for $.10 a share and those shares have a $5.00 FMV, it’s likely you will be required to pay AMT depending on the amount of options exercised, your household income, and other factors.  For example, let’s say I exercise 10,000 options at a strike price of $.10 and a FMV of $5.00.  This means I will pay $1,000 to my employer for a quantity of stock worth $50,000.  This difference of $49,000 could force me to be eligible for AMT, depending on my household income and other factors.  What’s so problematic about AMT is that you may need to pay taxes on exercised options without being able to sell your shares, perhaps because your company doesn’t yet allow selling of shares.  So imagine the following example:

  1. Exercise 10,000 options at a strike price of $.10
  2. Pay my employer $1,000
  3. Assume FMV of $5.00 per share, making my options worth $50,000
  4. Assume AMT applies to me
  5. I may need to pay thousands or tens-of-thousands of dollars in AMT taxes due to the $49,000 difference, depending on household income and other factors
  6. The company goes bankrupt and my shares are worth nothing.

The above situation is possible because the FMV is very volatile in startups.  Let’s say the FMV drops from $5.00 to $1.00 the next tax year, I’ve still paid taxes on a $5.00 FMV!  And if the company goes bankrupt I’ll have paid taxes on equity I wasn’t able to sell!  And I’ll have given the company money to exercise my options!  Ouch!  Note that in this case one accumulates AMT credit, which might decrease future AMT amounts.  Again, wildly complicated!

One only needs to optimize for AMT in the event of an increase in FMV.  If your startup sees a large increase in FMV, you should absolutely attempt to exercise your options before the FMV increases, avoiding AMT altogether.  Otherwise you’ll need to be prepared to pay taxes in April, or make the decision to wait to exercise and immediately sell, forcing you to pay short-term capital gains.

Conclusions

ISOs and their tax implications are confusing and tricky.  And playing this game may save you thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of dollars depending on how your startup performs.  I highly recommend reading Consider Your Options and consulting a tax specialist if you get yourself some stock options.  And please let me know if my post is incorrect, or if I’m missing anything.

In other news, I was expecting this post to be nice and short, in contrast to most other essays on this subject.  However, I seem to have failed to make this short and concise.  Pesky task law :).

San Francisco Prop 8 Protest: The Fight for Love

I would estimate between 5,000 and 10,000 people were grouped around the steps of City Hall, listening to stories, hoping for change, and believing that Gays will have equal rights soon.  I was utterly touched by my experience today.  I laughed at a few signs like the following:

I was sapping towards signs like the following:

And I was moved by the turnout, speakers, and general essence of such a wonderful movement.  With the passing of Prop 8, a proposition that creates an amendment to the California constitution outlawing same-sex marriage, Gays are no longer recognizes as equals by our governing doctrine.  This is despicable.  Every man and woman enters this world as an equal, some loving the opposite sex, and some loving the same sex.  Certain religious organizations made large contributions to the Yes on 8 campaign, the most notable being the Mormon Church, who donated over $20,000,000 (that’s 7 zeros).

Reverend Amos Brown, one of Martin Luther King Jr.’s six students, gave the best, most motivational, moving speech I have ever witnessed.  His booming, powerful voice echoed off the concrete and steal buildings which house our governing body, preaching love and equality and peace and happiness.  His words touched our hearts, and his presence gave us that tingly feeling in our spine that makes us understand that this is something, that there is something here, something worth fighting for.  Here is the speech, though the video isn’t all that good:

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

After the speeches had finished, the whole crowd proceeded to march to Market Street, the most famous street in San Francisco, towards the Castro, which is perhaps the largest Gay neighborhood in the world.  Thousands marched as millions watched.  They marched for their rights to love whom they have wanted to love since they were born.  They marched for their friends and family, loved ones and childrens, in hopes of one day having equal rights.

America has fought for equality before, and now it fights again.  It fights now, not for gender or race, but for love.  It fights for love, and what a wonderful thing to fight for.  Love.

This is Something

I just got finished with my semi-weekly Facebook friend-list pass.  I am utterly inspired by how many of my friends are talking about voting today.  I have at least 50 status updates from friends encouraging others to go and vote.  Some mention who they are voting for, and others don’t.

The point I’m trying to make is that this is something.  My friends, who are generally apathetic about politics, are getting involved in this election; they have an emotional connection and a deep, strong hope that this nation’s politics will change.  Generation Y wants change; we’re hoping for change.

And we need change.  Too long have we been plagued with neoconservative bullshit.  Too long have we spent money and time on issues that are both irrelevant to common good and are not our own.  Too long have we, American citizens and residents, been represented by an administration that does not represent anything that we believe in, that we agree with, that we need.  Enough.

Ignorrance is Bliss

The following two videos are utterly despicable.  Shame on those filmed for being so ignorant, and shame on those filming for provoking this, somehow thinking that these videos are productive.  The only way in which they are productive is to show us the types of people that live in this nation.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Is it too complex to ask one man to have mutual respect for a fellow man’s culture, religion, and dignity?  Is it too complex to understand that we are all living on this small world together?  It’s productive to have competition and a moderate level of disagreement, but the dialog captured in these videos is despicable; those involved should be ashamed.

There are different types of people in this world: some that believe in one thing; others that believe the opposite; and even others who believe something entirely different.  Difference is good; culture is good.  Some of the people filmed in these videos are different; some are racist and intolerant.  Though I am no moral authority, I believe that these people are wronged in hating, and it sickens me.  One is not wronged by disagreeing and holding one’s own beliefs, but one is wronged when negatively affecting others with harsh and untrue circumstances.  Treat man as thou wishes to be treated — the golden rule.  It is wrong to judge someone by their name, of which they did not even choose themselves.  It’s despicable what some of these people say.

For the record, I am not making any claim that all McCain / Palin supports have these opinions.  I am not claiming that Obama is a better candidate.  I am not claiming that the creators of this video did the right thing.  I am merely commenting on the ways in which filmer and filmee have reduced themselves to animals, with no reason or self control that would otherwise allow us to work together.

These videos have made me physically ill.  I wish we could all get along, agreeing to disagree, mutually respecting those around us, working together to create a loving, happy, working world.  I suppose perhaps things aren’t that simple, but I refuse to ever believe otherwise.

Update: the post I have just written brings to mind the following post, which I recommend you read if you’re a member of Generation Y.  Generation Y is Too Quiet, Too Conservative

Update 2: this one is pretty bad as well:

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video